Skip to main content

Preview build: sign-in and grading run on the server. MFA is not enabled, and storage is in server memory so it does not survive a restart.

LearnDefend
Malware Behavioral Triage
TheoryHard15 minIncident TriageIOC Analysis

Triage Decision: Capability, Severity and Response

What is it?

The triage decision converts behaviour and indicators into an answer the business can act on: what is this sample capable of, how severe is it, how far has it spread, and what should be done now. Capability is the classification (infostealer, ransomware, backdoor, loader); severity weighs capability against the asset it landed on; scope uses the chosen IOCs to count affected hosts; response is the containing action that fits.

Why it matters

Analysis that does not end in a decision is not triage. A responder, a manager and an on-call engineer all need the same crisp output: what it does, how bad, how wide, and the first action. Getting capability and severity right sends the right people; getting scope right stops you containing one host while nineteen keep beaconing; getting the response right cuts the threat without destroying the evidence you will need.

Where you see it

The decision draws on everything already gathered: the behaviour categories from Lesson 1, the ranked IOCs from Lesson 2, the asset's role from the inventory, and the estate-wide match results. It is recorded as a triage verdict — capability, severity, scope, and recommended action — the hand-off to incident response.

What normal looks like

A proportionate verdict matches action to capability and asset: a low-capability adware sample on a single kiosk is cleaned and monitored; a credential stealer on a domain admin's workstation is a high-severity incident escalated at once. The response is neither panic nor complacency but a fit to the facts.

What suspicious looks like

A broken triage is one that stops early or acts disproportionately: closing a 'clean AV' case with active C2 still running, or wiping a host before scoping and losing both the evidence and the count of other victims. The tell is a decision that does not follow from the four questions — capability, severity, scope, response.

How analysts investigate

Answer the four questions in order. Classify capability from the behaviour chain; set severity by combining capability with the value and exposure of the asset; scope by matching your durable IOCs across the estate; then choose the least destructive action that stops the threat and preserves evidence — usually isolate or contain, escalating by severity.

Common beginner mistakes

  • Ending at 'it is malicious' without stating capability, severity, scope and a response.
  • Rating severity on the malware alone, ignoring the value and exposure of the asset it hit.
  • Wiping or re-imaging before scoping — destroying the evidence and the victim count.

What you will be able to do

  • Classify a sample's capability from its behaviour chain.
  • Set severity by combining capability with the asset's value and exposure.
  • Scope with durable IOCs and choose an evidence-preserving response.

Triage is a decision, and the decision has four parts asked in order. Skip any and the output is not actionable — 'it's bad' does not tell a responder whether to page the on-call at 3 a.m. or clean it in the morning. The four questions turn your reading into that answer.

QuestionWhat you produce
1. Capability?A class: infostealer / ransomware / backdoor / loader
2. Severity?Capability × the asset's value and exposure
3. Scope?Count of hosts matching the durable IOCs
4. Response?Least destructive action that stops it and preserves evidence

Worked example — same malware, two verdicts

Two triage cases · identical credential-stealer sample
CASE A  asset: kiosk-12 (public lobby kiosk, no domain account)
CASE B  asset: WS-adm-02 (a domain administrator's workstation)
both:   capability = infostealer (reads credential stores, beacons out)
The sample and its behaviour are identical. Before reading on, decide: do the two cases get the same severity and response?

The answer: no — capability is the same, severity is not. Severity is capability weighed against the asset. On the lobby kiosk with no domain account, an infostealer has little to steal: contain, clean, and monitor. On a domain administrator's workstation, the same stealer may harvest credentials to the entire domain: this is a high-severity incident — isolate immediately, escalate, and force a credential reset. Then, in both, scope with the durable IOCs (the mutex, the C2 domain) to find any other victims before you close. The malware set the floor; the asset set the ceiling.

Recap

  • Triage ends in a decision with four parts: capability, severity, scope, response.
  • Severity = capability weighed against the asset's value and exposure.
  • Order is fixed: contain, scope with IOCs, then eradicate — never eradicate first.

Sign in to save your progress on the server.